PUBLICATION POLICYVersion 1.0 · 2 September 2026
Editorial and evidence standard
How GERO Research turns frontier-lab reporting into independent mathematical analysis without blurring claims, evidence or authorship.
Five publication lanes
- Original research — full essays, methods and product theses by Xamit Kadirbekov.
- Frontier lab watch — original GERO briefs based on primary laboratory sources.
- Independent numerical audits — exact, reproducible defects in public technical artifacts, linked to the upstream record.
- Technical notes — specifications, proofs, benchmarks and implementation records.
- Reproductions — experiments that rerun or challenge a published claim.
The mandatory structure
Every frontier brief separates what the source reports, GERO's mathematical interpretation, the proposed GERO response, a falsifiable experiment and the boundary of the available evidence.
Evidence rules
- Prefer papers, technical reports and official research pages.
- Do not republish third-party articles. Use original summaries and direct source links.
- Link material factual and quantitative claims to the primary source.
- Do not describe a software smoke test as independent scientific validation.
- For software findings, distinguish documentation, implementation and security defects.
- Record review dates and preserve material corrections.
- Declare sponsorship, conflicts and non-independent evaluation.
Status vocabulary
- SOURCE REPORT — reported by the linked laboratory and not independently reproduced by GERO.
- GERO ANALYSIS — our mathematical interpretation or proposal.
- REPRODUCED — rerun from documented artifacts with the procedure published.
- VERIFIED — supported inside an explicitly bounded machine-checkable scope.
- OPEN — unresolved or awaiting independent evidence.