← Research index
PUBLICATION POLICYVersion 1.0 · 2 September 2026

Editorial and evidence standard

How GERO Research turns frontier-lab reporting into independent mathematical analysis without blurring claims, evidence or authorship.

Five publication lanes

  • Original research — full essays, methods and product theses by Xamit Kadirbekov.
  • Frontier lab watch — original GERO briefs based on primary laboratory sources.
  • Independent numerical audits — exact, reproducible defects in public technical artifacts, linked to the upstream record.
  • Technical notes — specifications, proofs, benchmarks and implementation records.
  • Reproductions — experiments that rerun or challenge a published claim.

The mandatory structure

Every frontier brief separates what the source reports, GERO's mathematical interpretation, the proposed GERO response, a falsifiable experiment and the boundary of the available evidence.

Evidence rules

  • Prefer papers, technical reports and official research pages.
  • Do not republish third-party articles. Use original summaries and direct source links.
  • Link material factual and quantitative claims to the primary source.
  • Do not describe a software smoke test as independent scientific validation.
  • For software findings, distinguish documentation, implementation and security defects.
  • Record review dates and preserve material corrections.
  • Declare sponsorship, conflicts and non-independent evaluation.

Status vocabulary

  • SOURCE REPORT — reported by the linked laboratory and not independently reproduced by GERO.
  • GERO ANALYSIS — our mathematical interpretation or proposal.
  • REPRODUCED — rerun from documented artifacts with the procedure published.
  • VERIFIED — supported inside an explicitly bounded machine-checkable scope.
  • OPEN — unresolved or awaiting independent evidence.