Open research · Snapshot 16 September 2026

Where We Stand on the
Collatz Conjecture

A map of checked steps, conditional results and missing arguments. The full conjecture remains unproved.

Khamit Kadyrbekov · Daniyal Kadirbekov · AI-assisted exploration and internal review
Internally checked, in stated scopeOpen obligation356 nodes · 532 relationships
The complete text graph is available in the search panel and graph data link.
Spatial distance has no mathematical meaning.
Drag to rotate; scroll to zoom; select a node to read it. There is no automatic animation. Dashed relationships mark a gap, restriction or conditional connection.

Where the current branch stops

Recent reports separate a restricted denominator problem into deep divisibility and large multiplicative orders. A first coefficient certificate has degree less than 4d under stated hypotheses, independent of the full matrix length.

The actual coefficient bounds, the global denominator estimate, and coverage of arbitrary trajectories remain open. Closing a local branch would not complete Collatz.

How to read the green nodes

Green retains the project's internal review status. Some green nodes establish a conditional lemma or identify why a proposed argument fails. They do not claim external peer review or established novelty.

This is a navigation map, not a formally verified proof graph. Node counts cannot be converted into a percentage solved or a completion date. Original report identifiers are retained for discussion and correction.

Read the source notes, including the precise scope of Tao's theorem.